Managing Individual Learning Plans in Large University Classes: UK Legal and Workload Solutions

1. Executive Summary

This report examines the challenges and solutions for efficiently managing Individual Learning Plans (ILPs) in university classes with approximately 250 students. It focuses on the legal requirements in the United Kingdom and strategies to mitigate workload issues for staff. The report covers the impact of large class sizes on ILP implementation, current UK legal requirements, technological solutions, and best practices for managing ILPs in higher education.

2. Introduction

Individual Learning Plans (ILPs) are crucial tools in higher education for addressing the diverse needs of students. However, implementing ILPs in large university classes, particularly those with around 250 students, presents significant challenges. These challenges include ensuring equitable access to tailored educational experiences, addressing workload distribution among staff, and leveraging technology to streamline processes.

This report aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the strategies and solutions for efficiently managing ILPs in large university classes, with a specific focus on UK legal requirements and workload mitigation for staff.

3. Impact of Large Class Sizes on ILP Implementation

3.1 Reduced Individual Attention

Large class sizes inherently limit the amount of individual attention that instructors can provide to students. This is a significant barrier to the effective implementation of ILPs, which require tailored educational approaches for each student. Research indicates that in large classes, students often perceive lower levels of teacher interaction and satisfaction [1] [2]. This lack of interaction can hinder the customization and monitoring of ILPs, as instructors may struggle to address the unique needs of each student.

3.2 Increased Workload for Educators

The creation and maintenance of ILPs for a large number of students can be an overwhelming task for educators. Each ILP requires significant preparation time, including assessing individual needs, setting goals, and monitoring progress [3]. In large classes, this workload becomes monumental, leading to potential burnout and reduced effectiveness in delivering personalized education.

3.3 Challenges in Equity and Accessibility

Large class sizes can exacerbate inequities in education. Students with disabilities, learning difficulties, or other additional needs may not receive the necessary support due to the logistical challenges of managing ILPs in such settings [4]. Furthermore, the lack of resources and time can result in inconsistent standards and execution of ILPs across different students [5].

3.4 Fragmentation of the Learning Experience

In large classes, there is a risk of over-individualization, where the collective learning experience becomes fragmented. This can lead to some students feeling isolated or singled out based on their specific needs or goals [6]. Additionally, the sheer diversity of learning trajectories in large classes can make it difficult to maintain a cohesive educational environment.

3.5 Logistical and Technological Barriers

Managing ILPs in large classes often requires significant logistical planning and coordination. Without adequate technological support, tracking and updating ILPs for hundreds of students can become unmanageable [7]. Moreover, the lack of access to appropriate technology or training for educators can further hinder the effective implementation of ILPs [8].

4. UK Legal Requirements for Individual Learning Plans in Universities

4.1 Legal Framework

In the UK, the legal requirements for supporting students with disabilities or special needs in higher education are primarily governed by the Equality Act 2010, the Children and Families Act 2014, and associated statutory guidance such as the Special Educational Needs and Disability (SEND) Code of Practice. These laws and policies establish the rights of students with disabilities and outline the responsibilities of universities to provide appropriate support.

4.2 Equality Act 2010

The Equality Act 2010 is the cornerstone of anti-discrimination legislation in the UK. It mandates that universities and other higher education institutions must:

• Eliminate discrimination, harassment, and victimization against disabled students [9].
• Advance equality of opportunity for disabled students.
• Make reasonable adjustments to ensure that disabled students are not placed at a substantial disadvantage compared to their non-disabled peers [10] [11].

Reasonable adjustments may include:

• Providing alternative assessment methods [12].
• Offering assistive technologies or specialist equipment.
• Ensuring physical and digital accessibility, such as compliance with Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 AA for online platforms [13].

4.3 Children and Families Act 2014

The Children and Families Act 2014 introduced the Education, Health, and Care Plan (EHCP), which is a legally binding document for students with complex needs. Key provisions include:

• Local authorities must assess and prepare EHCPs for students with significant disabilities or special educational needs [14].
• EHCPs must outline the specific educational, health, and social care support required to meet the student’s needs [15].
• Universities are required to honor the provisions of EHCPs for students transitioning from secondary education [16].

4.4 Special Educational Needs and Disability (SEND) Code of Practice

The SEND Code of Practice provides statutory guidance on supporting students with special educational needs and disabilities. It emphasizes:

• A graduated approach to SEN support, which includes the use of Individualized Education Plans (IEPs) or similar documents to outline specific goals, support strategies, and accommodations [17] [18].
• Collaboration between students, parents, and university staff in developing and reviewing support plans [19].
• Regular monitoring and evaluation of the effectiveness of support provided [20].

4.5 Specific Regulations for Students with Disabilities or Special Needs

4.5.1 Disabled Students’ Allowance (DSA)

The Disabled Students’ Allowance (DSA) is a government grant designed to help students with disabilities cover study-related costs. Key features include:

• DSA is non-means-tested and provides up to £27,783 per year for eligible students [21] [22].
• It covers costs for specialist equipment, non-medical helpers, and other disability-related study support [23].
• Students must undergo a needs assessment to determine the specific support required [24].

4.5.2 Public Sector Equality Duty (PSED)

Under the Equality Act 2010, universities are subject to the Public Sector Equality Duty (PSED), which requires them to:

• Take proactive steps to identify and address barriers faced by disabled students [25].
• Foster an inclusive culture and ensure that disabled students are actively involved in decisions regarding their support [26].

4.5.3 Reasonable Adjustments in Higher Education

Universities are legally obligated to make reasonable adjustments for students with disabilities. This includes:

• Adapting teaching methods and assessment formats to accommodate individual needs [12].
• Providing accessible learning materials and environments.
• Ensuring that staff are trained to understand and implement reasonable adjustments effectively.

4.6 Individual Learning Plans (ILPs) in Higher Education

While the use of Individual Learning Plans (ILPs) is not explicitly mandated by UK law, they are widely recognized as a best practice for supporting students with disabilities or special needs. ILPs serve as personalized documents that outline:

• The student’s specific learning needs and goals [27].
• The support strategies and accommodations required to meet those needs [28].
• The roles and responsibilities of staff, parents, and external professionals in providing support [29].

ILPs are often used in conjunction with EHCPs or as part of the graduated approach to SEN support in mainstream education [17].

4.7 Challenges and Gaps in Implementation

Despite the robust legal framework, several challenges remain in implementing individual learning plans and supporting students with disabilities in higher education:

• Inconsistent Practices: The level of support and the use of ILPs vary significantly across universities [30] [31].
• Disclosure Rates: Many students with disabilities do not disclose their conditions, which can hinder the provision of appropriate support.
• Workload Issues: Managing ILPs for large class sizes can place a significant burden on staff, particularly in universities with limited resources.

5. Strategies for Managing Workload Issues Related to ILPs

5.1 Development of Holistic Workload Models

Universities have increasingly adopted holistic workload models to address equity, transparency, and efficiency in managing ILPs. For example, the Durban University of Technology developed a workload model that emphasizes equitable allocation of work and resources, ensuring that staff are not overburdened while maintaining the quality of ILPs [32]. This model incorporates empirical annual hour allocations and considers the diverse needs of students and staff.

5.2 Use of Technology and Automation

Technological solutions play a critical role in managing ILPs efficiently. Tools such as Asana, Trello, and ActivityTimeline have been used to streamline task allocation, monitor progress, and reduce manual workload [33] [34]. For instance, workload management software can help staff track student progress, set realistic deadlines, and automate routine tasks, thereby reducing administrative burdens [35] [36].

5.3 Collaborative and Consultative Approaches

Involving academic staff in the design and implementation of workload models has proven effective in addressing workload issues. A study on workload allocation in universities highlighted the importance of consultation and collaboration with staff to ensure buy-in and balance [37] [38]. This approach fosters a sense of ownership and ensures that workload distribution aligns with staff capabilities and institutional goals.

5.4 Flexible Scheduling and Prioritization

Flexible scheduling allows staff to manage their time more effectively, particularly when dealing with large class sizes. Strategies such as breaking down tasks into smaller, manageable chunks and prioritizing high-impact activities have been shown to improve efficiency [39]. Additionally, providing staff with the autonomy to adjust their schedules based on workload demands can mitigate stress and enhance productivity.

5.5 Integration of Support Systems

Support systems, including dedicated administrative staff and mental health resources, are essential for managing workload issues. For example, the University of Cincinnati implemented a pilot program that provided flexible due dates for assignments, reducing stress and anxiety among both students and staff [40] [41]. This initiative also included access to mental health counselors, further supporting staff well-being.

5.6 Training and Capacity Building

Investing in staff training and capacity building ensures that educators are equipped to manage ILPs effectively. Training programs on time management, use of technology, and inclusive teaching practices can enhance staff efficiency and reduce workload-related challenges [42].

5.7 Streamlining Curriculum and Assessment

Simplifying curricula and aligning assessments with learning outcomes can reduce the workload associated with ILPs. Evidence-based teaching practices, such as reducing curricular hoarding and focusing on essential content, have been shown to improve efficiency and student outcomes [43] [44].

6. Technological Solutions and Software Platforms for ILP Management

6.1 Key Features of Technological Solutions for ILPs

Technological solutions for managing ILPs in large classes typically include the following features:

1. Automation and Workflow Management: Platforms like Learning Pathways and Docebo automate the creation, monitoring, and updating of ILPs, reducing manual workload for educators [45] [46].
2. Data Analytics and Reporting: Tools such as Canvas LMS and adaptive learning platforms like CogBooks provide real-time analytics to track student progress and identify areas requiring intervention.
3. Personalization and Adaptivity: Adaptive learning platforms, such as Knewton and DreamBox, use AI to tailor learning paths to individual student needs, ensuring that each student receives a customized educational experience [47].
4. Collaboration and Communication: Platforms like Nearpod and Springly facilitate collaboration among educators, students, and stakeholders, ensuring that ILPs are developed and implemented collaboratively.
5. Integration with Existing Systems: Many platforms, including Moodle and Canvas, integrate seamlessly with other educational tools and systems, such as video conferencing and plagiarism detection software, to provide a unified learning environment [48] [49].

6.2 Leading Software Platforms for Managing ILPs

6.2.1 Canvas LMS

Canvas LMS is a cloud-based learning management system widely used in higher education. It offers robust features for managing ILPs, including:

• Integration with over 600 educational technology tools, such as Google Classroom and Microsoft Teams [48].
• Real-time analytics to monitor student progress and engagement.
• Customizable course templates and branding to align with institutional policies [50].
• Free access for students, making it a cost-effective solution.

6.2.2 Moodle

Moodle is an open-source LMS that supports the creation and management of ILPs. Key features include:

• A modular design that allows administrators to add or create features as needed [51].
• Integration with various tools, such as video conferencing and plagiarism detection [49].
• A large user base of over 250 million, ensuring a well-supported and scalable platform [52].

6.2.3 CogBooks

CogBooks is an adaptive learning platform that provides personalized learning experiences. It is particularly effective for large classes due to its:

• AI-driven adaptive algorithms that tailor content to individual student needs [53].
• Real-time feedback and analytics to track student progress.
• Proven success in improving pass rates in university courses, such as increasing the average pass rate in Trigonometry and Pre-calculus from 76% to 94% at Colorado Technical University [54].

6.2.4 Nearpod

Nearpod is a comprehensive platform for K-12 and higher education that supports ILP management through:

• Interactive assessment features to gain insights into student learning needs [55].
• Tools for delivering targeted instruction to individuals or groups [56].
• Real-time data and post-session reports for tracking progress [57].

6.2.5 Docebo

Docebo is a cloud-based LMS that excels in managing complex academic curriculums. Its features include:

• AI-driven content curation and adaptive learning pathways [58].
• Tools for creating personalized learning paths based on individual roles and skill levels [46].
• Seamless integration with other educational tools and systems [59].

6.2.6 Learning Pathways

Learning Pathways is a digital tool specifically designed to streamline the management of ILPs. It offers:

• Automation of ILP creation and updates, reducing manual workload [45].
• Collaboration features that allow all stakeholders to work together seamlessly [60].
• Tools for monitoring progress and reflecting on daily observations.

6.3 Benefits of Technological Solutions

1. Efficiency: Automation and data-driven insights reduce the administrative burden on educators, allowing them to focus on teaching and student engagement [45] [61].
2. Scalability: Platforms like Moodle and Canvas are designed to handle large class sizes, making them suitable for universities with hundreds of students per class.
3. Personalization: Adaptive learning platforms ensure that each student receives a tailored educational experience, even in large classes.
4. Collaboration: Tools like Nearpod and Springly enhance communication and collaboration among educators, students, and stakeholders.
5. Compliance: Many platforms include features to ensure compliance with legal requirements, such as accessibility standards and data privacy regulations [62].

6.4 Challenges and Considerations

1. Integration with Existing Systems: Ensuring that new platforms integrate seamlessly with existing university systems can be challenging [63].
2. Training and Adoption: Educators and administrators may require training to effectively use these platforms [64].
3. Cost: While some platforms offer free versions, advanced features often require paid subscriptions [49].
4. Data Privacy and Security: Protecting sensitive student information is critical, particularly when using cloud-based platforms [62] [65].

7. Best Practices for Managing ILPs in Large Classes

7.1 Leverage Technology for Scalability

• Learning Management Systems (LMS): Platforms like Canvas, Google Classroom, and Microsoft Education can centralize ILP management, allowing educators to track progress, set goals, and provide feedback efficiently [66] [67].
• AI and Adaptive Learning Tools: AI-driven platforms such as Knewton and Realizeit can automate aspects of ILP management, such as personalized content delivery and real-time performance assessment [68] [69].
• Data Analytics: Tools that analyze student performance data can help educators identify at-risk students and tailor interventions accordingly.
• Automated Grading and Feedback: Technologies like Edpuzzle and Socrative can reduce the grading burden, allowing educators to focus on personalized interactions [70].

7.2 Adopt Structured and Collaborative Approaches

• Team-Based Learning (TBL): This approach involves dividing students into smaller groups for collaborative tasks, which can make large classes feel more manageable and improve engagement [71].
• Peer-Led Team Learning (PLTL): Peer leaders can facilitate small group discussions, providing additional support for students while reducing the workload on educators [72].
• Group Contracts and Peer Evaluations: Encouraging students to establish group contracts and conduct peer evaluations can foster accountability and reduce the need for constant instructor oversight [73].

7.3 Streamline ILP Processes

• Standardized Templates: Using standardized ILP templates with clear, measurable goals can simplify the creation and monitoring process [74].
• SMART Goals: Setting Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-bound (SMART) targets ensures clarity and focus in ILPs [75].
• Periodic Reviews: Embedding regular review cycles into ILPs allows for dynamic adaptability and ensures that plans remain relevant [76].

7.4 Professional Development for Educators

• Training on Inclusive Pedagogies: Professional development programs can equip educators with strategies for managing diverse learning needs in large classes [77].
• Time Management Workshops: Training on efficient time management and delegation can help educators handle the increased workload associated with large classes [78].

7.5 Foster Student Autonomy

• Self-Directed Learning: Encouraging students to take ownership of their ILPs by setting their own goals and tracking their progress can reduce the administrative burden on educators [79].
• Blended Learning Models: Combining online and face-to-face instruction allows students to engage with materials at their own pace, freeing up class time for personalized interactions [80].

7.6 Enhance Communication and Support

• Frequent Communication: Regular updates through LMS platforms or email can keep students informed and engaged.
• Teaching Assistants (TAs): Utilizing TAs to assist with ILP management can distribute the workload and provide additional support for students.

8. Case Studies and Examples

8.1 Durban University of Technology

The Durban University of Technology serves as a case study for the development of a holistic workload model. This model emphasizes equitable resource allocation, transparency, and the integration of entrepreneurship into higher education. The university’s approach highlights the importance of collaborative networks, efficient research infrastructure, and established research competence in managing workload issues [32].

8.2 University of Cincinnati

A pilot program at the University of Cincinnati explored the impact of flexible due dates on workload management. The program allowed students to choose their own schedules for assignment submissions, reducing stress and fostering autonomy. While this approach required increased instructor involvement, it demonstrated the potential for innovative strategies to address workload challenges in large classes [40] [81].

8.3 Open University

The Open University has implemented several projects to address student workload management, particularly in distance education. These initiatives include the use of learning design principles to determine appropriate study hours and the integration of automatic feedback systems to support time-poor students. These strategies have been effective in reducing dropout rates and improving student satisfaction.

8.4 Australian Universities

A case study at an Australian university examined the use of a 40:40:20 workload model, which allocates time for teaching, research, and administration. This model, combined with transparent workload monitoring and staff consultation, has been effective in managing workload issues in large classes [82].

8.5 University of Salford

The Managing Academic Workload (MAW) project at the University of Salford aimed to address inequality in workload allocation through a transparent and consultative approach. The project developed a single system for workload management, ensuring equity and efficiency across the institution [83] [84].

8.6 Summit Public Schools

This institution uses a blended learning model where students work at their own pace, supported by one-on-one teacher interactions. This approach has been successful in managing personalized learning at scale [80].

8.7 University-Level Adaptive Courseware

A case study highlighted the use of LLM-powered adaptive courseware to tailor content and assessments to each student’s knowledge level and learning pace, significantly enhancing engagement and outcomes [85].

8.8 High Tech High

This school employs project-based learning, allowing students to work on real-world projects with personalized support from teachers [86].

9. Conclusion

Managing Individual Learning Plans (ILPs) in large university classes with around 250 students presents significant challenges, particularly in terms of workload management for staff and compliance with UK legal requirements. However, by implementing a combination of technological solutions, structured approaches, and best practices, universities can effectively address these challenges.

Key strategies for mitigating workload issues include:

1. Leveraging technology and automation to streamline ILP management processes.
2. Adopting holistic workload models that ensure equitable distribution of responsibilities.
3. Implementing collaborative and team-based learning approaches to distribute the workload.
4. Providing professional development and training for staff to enhance efficiency and effectiveness.
5. Fostering student autonomy and self-directed learning to reduce administrative burdens.

To ensure compliance with UK legal requirements, universities must:

1. Adhere to the Equality Act 2010 by making reasonable adjustments and eliminating discrimination.
2. Implement the provisions of the Children and Families Act 2014, including honoring Education, Health, and Care Plans (EHCPs).
3. Follow the guidance provided in the Special Educational Needs and Disability (SEND) Code of Practice.
4. Utilize resources such as the Disabled Students’ Allowance (DSA) to support students with disabilities.
5. Fulfill the Public Sector Equality Duty (PSED) by proactively addressing barriers faced by disabled students.

By integrating these strategies and legal considerations, universities can create an inclusive and efficient learning environment that supports the diverse needs of students in large classes while managing staff workload effectively.

References

1. Workload Models and Entrepreneurial Administration for Strategic Academic Staff Support in South African Higher Education Institutions. https://www.academia.edu
2. 50 Interview Questions About Workload Management (With Answers). https://huntr.co
3. Workload Management: Essential Strategies to Boost Productivity. https://activitytimeline.com
4. Workload Management: Guide to Managing Workload Effectively [2025] • Asana. https://asana.com
5. Workload Management: Guide to Managing Workload Effectively [2025] • Asana. https://asana.com
6. Emerging principles for the allocation of academic work in universities. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
7. Emerging principles for the allocation of academic work in universities. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
8. Workload Management: Guide to Managing Workload Effectively [2025] • Asana. https://asana.com
9. The Impact of Providing Students With Greater Autonomy on Stress, Anxiety, and Project Management. https://www.naceweb.org
10. The Impact of Providing Students With Greater Autonomy on Stress, Anxiety, and Project Management. https://www.naceweb.org
11. Workload Management: Ultimate Guide to Efficiency. https://productive.io
12. Reducing Student Workload Through Curricular Efficiency. https://www.sciencedirect.com
13. Reducing Student Workload Through Curricular Efficiency. https://www.sciencedirect.com
14. The Impact of Providing Students With Greater Autonomy on Stress, Anxiety, and Project Management. https://www.naceweb.org
15. Where does the time go? An academic workload case study at an Australian university. https://www.tandfonline.com
16. A beginner’s guide to academic workload modelling. https://wonkhe.com
17. A beginner’s guide to academic workload modelling. https://wonkhe.com
18. Class size, student behaviors and educational outcomes. https://www.emerald.com
19. Class size, student behaviors and educational outcomes. https://www.emerald.com
20. The Purpose of an Individual Learning Plan - Start Teaching. https://start-teaching.com
21. Individual learning plans (ILPs) for children and teenagers. https://raisingchildren.net.au
22. The Purpose of an Individual Learning Plan - Start Teaching. https://start-teaching.com
23. The Purpose of an Individual Learning Plan - Start Teaching. https://start-teaching.com
24. Large Classes. https://poorvucenter.yale.edu
25. Technology in the Classroom | Importance & Challenges | GoGuardian. https://www.goguardian.com
26. The Role of Education Technology in Personalized Learning: Transforming Education - Education-Load. https://education-load.net
27. Using Technology In The Classroom: Benefits And Top Tips. https://elearningindustry.com
28. 4 Ways to Leverage Technology to Enhance the Learning Experience. https://blog.definedlearning.com
29. Active Learning in Large Classes. https://www.montclair.edu
30. Active Learning in Large Classes. https://www.montclair.edu
31. Large Classes. https://poorvucenter.yale.edu
32. Teaching LARGE Classes. https://ctl.utexas.edu
33. Creating an Effective Individual Learning Plan. https://www.structural-learning.com
34. Creating an Effective Individual Learning Plan. https://www.structural-learning.com
35. Class Sizes: A Growing Issue Among Educators | NEA. https://www.nea.org
36. Does Your Child’s Class Size Matter? | K-12 Schools | U.S. News. https://www.usnews.com
37. Active Learning in Large Classes. https://www.montclair.edu
38. Class Size: What Research Says and What it Means for State Policy. https://www.brookings.edu
39. UK accessibility laws ⭐ a journey to inclusion & compliance. https://userway.org
40. The Common Framework for supporting disabled students. https://academic.admin.ox.ac.uk
41. Equality law obligations in higher education: reasonable adjustments under the Equality Act 2010 in assessment of students with unseen disabilities | Legal Studies | Cambridge Core. https://www.cambridge.org
42. Beyond the bare minimum: Are universities and colleges doing enough for disabled students? - Office for Students. https://www.officeforstudents.org.uk
43. New Title II Regulations of the ADA (2024) and Higher Education. https://www.uis.edu
44. Funding Higher Education for Disabled Students. https://www.disabilityrightsuk.org
45. Special Educational Needs - childlawadvice.org.uk. https://childlawadvice.org.uk
46. Understanding Individualised Education Plans (IEPs) in the UK: A Comprehensive Guide. https://www.eton-academy.uk
47. Understanding Individualised Education Plans (IEPs) in the UK: A Comprehensive Guide. https://www.eton-academy.uk
48. Understanding Individualised Education Plans (IEPs) in the UK: A Comprehensive Guide. https://www.eton-academy.uk
49. Understanding Individualised Education Plans (IEPs) in the UK: A Comprehensive Guide. https://www.eton-academy.uk
50. Understanding Individualised Education Plans (IEPs) in the UK: A Comprehensive Guide. https://www.eton-academy.uk
51. Help if you’re a student with a learning difficulty, health problem or disability. https://www.gov.uk
52. Funding Higher Education for Disabled Students. https://www.disabilityrightsuk.org
53. Help if you’re a student with a learning difficulty, health problem or disability. https://www.gov.uk
54. Help if you’re a student with a learning difficulty, health problem or disability. https://www.gov.uk
55. The Common Framework for supporting disabled students. https://academic.admin.ox.ac.uk
56. Disabled people. https://www.advance-he.ac.uk
57. Understanding Individualised Education Plans (IEPs) in the UK: A Comprehensive Guide. https://www.eton-academy.uk
58. Understanding Individualised Education Plans (IEPs) in the UK: A Comprehensive Guide. https://www.eton-academy.uk
59. individual education plans. https://www.autism.org.uk
60. Beyond the bare minimum: Are universities and colleges doing enough for disabled students? - Office for Students. https://www.officeforstudents.org.uk
61. Equality law obligations in higher education: reasonable adjustments under the Equality Act 2010 in assessment of students with unseen disabilities | Legal Studies | Cambridge Core. https://www.cambridge.org
62. How to Create, Implement and Monitor Individual Learning Plans. https://www.tes.com
63. Creating and managing learning plans – Docebo Help & Support. https://help.docebo.com
64. The Top 10 Adaptive Learning Platforms of 2024. https://www.thirdrocktechkno.com
65. Learning Management System, LMS Software | Instructure. https://www.instructure.com
66. The Best Learning Management System - Moodle Online LMS. https://moodle.com
67. Higher Education LMS: Boost Student Engagement with the Best Learning Management System for Schools, Colleges and Universities • Intellek. https://intellek.io
68. The Best (LMS) Learning Management Systems | PCMag. https://www.pcmag.com
69. Learning management systems for higher education: a brief comparison - Discover Education. https://link.springer.com
70. The Top 10 Adaptive Learning Platforms of 2024. https://www.thirdrocktechkno.com
71. Using an adaptive learning tool to improve student performance and satisfaction in online and face-to-face education for a more personalized approach - Smart Learning Environments. https://slejournal.springeropen.com
72. How to create a personalized learning plan using student agency examples. https://nearpod.com
73. How to create a personalized learning plan using student agency examples. https://nearpod.com
74. How to create a personalized learning plan using student agency examples. https://nearpod.com
75. The Top 10 LMSs for Higher Education (Colleges & Universities). https://www.docebo.com
76. The Top 10 Adaptive Learning Platforms of 2024. https://www.thirdrocktechkno.com
77. How to Create, Implement and Monitor Individual Learning Plans. https://www.tes.com
78. 6. Adaptive Learning Platforms: Tailoring Instruction to Each Student’s Journey. https://www.linkedin.com
79. Revolutionizing Education: The Power of Adaptive Learning Platforms. https://siliconvalley.center
80. How to Develop a Personalized Learning Platform? - Matellio Inc. https://www.matellio.com
81. How to Develop a Personalized Learning Platform? - Matellio Inc. https://www.matellio.com
82. 10 Best Adaptive Learning Platforms in 2025. https://www.proprofstraining.com
83. The Implication of Large Class Size in the Teaching and Learning of Business Education in Tertiary Institution in Ekiti State,Nigeria.. https://www.linkedin.com
84. The Implication of Large Class Size in the Teaching and Learning of Business Education in Tertiary Institution in Ekiti State,Nigeria.. https://www.linkedin.com
85. (PDF) The empirical case against large class size: Adverse effects on the teaching, learning, and retention of first-year students. https://www.researchgate.net
86. The Implication of Large Class Size in the Teaching and Learning of Business Education in Tertiary Institution in Ekiti State,Nigeria.. https://www.linkedin.com
87. Top 23 Ed Tech Tools Revolutionizing Higher Education. https://www.enrollify.org
88. Top 23 Ed Tech Tools Revolutionizing Higher Education. https://www.enrollify.org
89. How to Drive Personalized Learning in Higher Education | Digital Marketing Institute. https://digitalmarketinginstitute.com
90. The Future of Education: LLMs in Personalized Learning and Development. https://www.linkedin.com
91. How online tools provide more individualized lessons | The Jotform Blog. https://www.jotform.com
92. Active Learning in Large Classes. https://www.montclair.edu
93. Large Classes. https://poorvucenter.yale.edu
94. How to create and manage groups. https://teaching.cornell.edu
95. Creating an Effective Individual Learning Plan. https://www.structural-learning.com
96. Creating an Effective Individual Learning Plan. https://www.structural-learning.com
97. The Purpose of an Individual Learning Plan - Start Teaching. https://start-teaching.com
98. Initial implementation of active learning strategies in large, lecture STEM courses: lessons learned from a multi-institutional, interdisciplinary STEM faculty development program - International Journal of STEM Education. https://stemeducationjournal.springeropen.com
99. Initial implementation of active learning strategies in large, lecture STEM courses: lessons learned from a multi-institutional, interdisciplinary STEM faculty development program - International Journal of STEM Education. https://stemeducationjournal.springeropen.com
100. Case Studies/Success Stories of Personalized Learning. https://www.linkedin.com
101. Case Studies/Success Stories of Personalized Learning. https://www.linkedin.com
102. The Future of Education: LLMs in Personalized Learning and Development. https://www.linkedin.com
103. Case Studies/Success Stories of Personalized Learning. https://www.linkedin.com